Monday, March 26, 2007

Your Vote: Is This Outfit Too Feminine?

I bought this outfit for John at a consignment sale and Chris thinks it's too girlie for a 4-month-old boy. It has red, white, and blue checks with red and blue rocking horses on it. I certainly admit that a boy or girl could wear it, so it is not unmistakably boyish, like an all blue outfit or brown courderoys.

When visiting my dad recently, I saw this photo of my little sister as a toddler wearing the same type of outfit, except it is a dress instead of onesie shorts. That made me wonder if the print is indeed too feminine!

So, everybody, cast your votes. Can John wear this little cute outfit, or should I put it back in the bin for if God ever blesses us with a daughter?

[EDIT: We need some men to vote! Chris says women aren't going to vote right. (That's just because they're agreeing with me so far!)]


8 comments:

  1. It's not girly... it's just babyish. Not one of our "little man" outfits. You might be glad for it on a really hot day if you are going on an outing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love it, but I love the sunsuits like this for boys, especially with the embroidery!
    I vote yes, it is precious for summer in the south! Aunt Holly

    ReplyDelete
  3. Absolutely!! Perfect for a little boy! And he looks precious and handsome!
    Ashley (from waay down south of you)

    ReplyDelete
  4. OK Chris, I would not put it on my boy, do you feel happy now? I still don't think it's girly, but it's definitely not boyish either.
    and hey, i have a size 4 pink pants suit for a little boy if you want to borrow it for john a little later. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I wasn't so sure until I looked at a larger version of the picture so that the overall pink effect resolved into blue and red with cute little horses. I vote with the ladies: cute as a button and great for hot days.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for all the votes so far! Yes, this outfit is babyish, I agree. It's interesting, I would put a girl in an outfit like this even at age one, but I probably wouldn't put a boy into it much beyond John's current four months. It's a funny double standard!

    ReplyDelete
  7. If we are going to error, let's error in the other direction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's boyly(the Womick children have come up with that adjective to describe something befitting masculinity.)Don't see a problem here.
    Carol W

    ReplyDelete